Date: 24th February 2011 at 11:53am
Written by:

MickTait shares some more thoughts with us, this time on the loanees we have and who gets left out of squads – read on for more.

So we are restricted to five with our loan players that feature in the first team squad at any one go, I suppose fair enough. BUT whilst not a great fan of either how did Dickinson get the nod over Sonko against Palace?

We sent Dickinson back to Stoke because we think he is injured. Stoke disagree and send him back. So how did SC pick his subs against Palace?

If it was just to cover left back then we have plenty already available Ward etc. I hesitate to say this but surely Sonko should have been on the bench and Dickinson left to recover as we, PFC, think he is unfit.

Answers on a postcard please.

Written by MickTait.

The views within this article are the views of the individual who wrote and submitted this piece, sometimes solely theirs. They are not necessarily shared by the Vital Pompey Site Journalists.

  • Click here to make your prediction: Ipswich v Pompey.

    Join the Vital Pompey Debate

    Trust

  • Frippy’s Virtual Bookies – latest update and place your bets!

  •  

    6 Replies to “Loan Players”

    • its a tough call, you could not blame him for leaving either player out could you and they ‘should’ be the ones that are being thought of when all loanees are available…
      i could understand the reasoning behind dicko being in ahead of sonko more if he was fully fit, but as you say, the club clearly do not believe that he is.

    • Possibly, quite possibly, he was fit all along and his injury was a face-saver for SC to be able to play Hermann…. just one possible reason Mick! 🙂 PuP

    • Sonic Sonko – bad as he is probably shades it over Divy-ko for me AND Sonic has scored a goal- not that either should get a start Or for that fact my very favourite Mok- the- Weak

    Comments are closed.