Walsall 0 Pompey 1
Pompey picked up three points on the road for the fourth time in five trips and put themselves in the mix up for a play-off spot.
Kenny Jackett brought Gareth Evans into the starting line up with Connor Ronan dropping to the bench alongside fit again Oli Hawkins and Stuart O`Keefe.
This was quite simply a game Pompey had by the throat for the whole ninety minutes and they had to be patient and wait for the goal(s) to come.
It did on eighty minutes when Jamal Lowe set up Evans and he shot into the corner from the edge of the box.
The clubs involved in the fight for the two play-off spots realistically available – Scunthorpe, Plymouth, Peterborough, Charlton and Pompey – have similar looking run ins and it would be a brave man to pick the winners. Pompey however have the worst goal difference which could end up being a factor.
With only forty eight hours rest until the Wigan game Kenny will have to use his squad to the full but with more players back to fitness that has to be good news.
Pompey (4-1-4-1): McGee; Thompson, Whatmough, Clarke, Donohue; Walkes; Lowe, Evans, Close (Ronan 77), Naismith; Pitman (c)
Goals: Evans 79
Booked: Donohue, Walkes
Subs not used: Bass, Burgess, Haunstrup, O`Keefe, Kennedy, Hawkins
Referee: Darren Handley
Attendance: 5,159 (1,458 Pompey fans)
Afterwards Jackett said: “It`s a massive win and it keeps our season alive. We`re two points off fifth, so that and sixth spot are very much available for us. That`s the case for a number of teams and our form from now until the end of the season will determine whether we can get into those play-offs.
“We looked on top and had chances, getting some very good balls into the box from both sides of the pitch. Walsall had very little in the way of scoring opportunities and that gave a solid base for us to build from. It was just a case of wondering where the goal was going to come from, but it was a great strike from Gareth. I was right behind the shot and it was in from the moment he hit it. It was well deserved from someone who`s a terrific professional. Coming off the back of an injury, the goal will give him a lot of confidence and hopefully he can have a strong finish to the season.
“It keeps our good run going and now we`re looking forward to Monday`s game and the others we`ve got moving forward.”
Next week starts on Monday when Pompey entertain Wigan Athletic at 5:30pm live on Sky and is followed by a trip to Rochdale`s Spotland on Saturday.
Curiously both fixtures date back to September 1978 when Pompey found themselves in the Fourth Division for the first time and hence found some new names on the fixture list.
On 9 September Pompey travelled to Rochdale and recorded their first away win at the basement level as Steve Davey and John Lathan scored in a 2-0 win. The sad fact of the game was the attendance of just 1,479 which is the third lowest to watch a Pompey league game.
Seventeen days later Wigan, who had just replaced Southport in the Football League, came to Fratton Park and another Steve Davey goal was enough to pick up the points just two for a win in those days. The crowd was 13,902 almost ten times that of the visit to Dale. This will be Pompey`s first visit outside of the bottom tier.
The last visit of Wigan was in the Premier League in 2009 when a Aruna Dindane hat-trick and one from Frederic Piquionne gave Pompey a 4-0 victory and their first home points of the season after five consecutive home defeats.
The last visit to Spotland four years ago, ended in a 3-0 defeat and was the end of Richie Barker`s reign as Pompey manager.
I trust that many of you will have signed the on-line petition which was formulated by Blackpool fans reading ‘We urge the Government to introduce an independent regulator for English football, charged with ensuring the highest possible standards of governance for all clubs`.
This is of course a subject close to the hearts of all Pompey fans and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport have responded at some length to the call despite the fact that the required 100,000 signatures required for a Parliamentary debate has not yet been reached.
The response is as follows `HMG believes sports are best governed by modern, transparent, accountable and representative governing bodies, able to act decisively in the long-term interest of each sport and its participants.
HMG is aware of concerns that have been raised about the Football Association`s ability to govern the game effectively. As the national governing body for football in England, the FA is responsible for regulating, promoting and developing the game at every level.
The Sports Governance Code that came into force on 1 April 2017 applies to all sporting bodies in receipt of public funding from Sport England and UK Sport. It challenges the FA and all other governing bodies to demonstrate that they meet the highest standards of governance and regulation. The Code requires evidence that sports bodies operate efficiently and successfully while being transparent and representative of society.
We therefore welcome the reforms the FA has made to comply with the Code that include reducing its Board in size from 12 to 10 members, ensuring a more even gender split, and ensuring at least a quarter of its members are independent of football club interests. We believe that moving to a thoroughly strategic, accountable and representative Board with the right mix of skills, diversity and experience is the key to unlocking the long-term potential of football in this country, from grassroots up to the national teams.
The reform of the FA Council; changes to tenure, and the addition of new members will help ensure this body is also more representative of the modern game. The principle that all FA Committees should report to the Board is one we strongly support and is a requirement under the Code.
We are comfortable that the actions the FA has already taken and further actions it has agreed to implement to comply with the Sports Governance Code will improve its governance. This will continue to be monitored and managed through funding conditions which require ongoing compliance with the Code.
The Premier League (PL) and the English Football League (EFL) are not in receipt of public funding and therefore they and the clubs in their leagues are not regulated through the mandatory condition of funding which requires compliance with the Sports Governance Code. However, the PL and the EFL have established their own regulatory frameworks which clubs are required to comply with in order to participate in their respective leagues.
Indeed, we welcome the fact that the financial state of football clubs in this country is better now than at any time over the last 20 years. Measures introduced in recent years include the Leagues requiring business cases and proof of funds from club owners, a working relationship between clubs and HMRC over tax owed, and the adoption of financial fair play rules. Together these have helped curb club debt and promoted sustainability. However, football clubs and the football authorities cannot be complacent. They must keep these rules under constant review.
Similarly, with regard to ownership of clubs, the onus for the football authorities is ensuring the criteria (known as the ‘Owners and Directors (ODT) Test`) as to whom can hold a controlling interest in clubs is as robust as possible, that due diligence is carried out on owners and conditions on what they can and cannot do are laid down from the start. We are pleased the football authorities have agreed to keep the ODT test under regular review and to listen to supporters` concerns. This promise was outlined in the report of the Government`s Expert Working Group on Supporter Ownership and Engagement published in January 2016.
We are clear that we do not expect that the PL or EFL`s rulebooks will be superseded but it is right that policy-making on disciplinary issues sits outside the Leagues. The Football Regulatory Authority for example, is a body responsible for regulatory, disciplinary and rule-making for football played in England. The membership of the body is jointly made up of representatives from the national game, professional game and independent non-executives.
The Independent Football Ombudsman is also there to receive and adjudicate on complaints which have failed to be resolved by football clubs or the football authorities. The IFO is an important part of football`s self-regulatory system.
We accept that football governance must keep evolving if it is to keep pace with the challenges of the modern game and the global commercial attractiveness of English football. The Sports Governance Code helps, but the FA and other football bodies responsible for regulation of the game should continue to review how they are set up to ensure the effective running of the sport. At present, the regulatory framework that operates via league regulation through the PL and the EFL demonstrates there is already regulation of the governance of all football clubs. Where regulation is being managed by the existing authorities in football to the extent which it is, this negates the desire or need to establish an independent regulator.
An interesting and detailed reply but does it really address the problem that in the past the football authorities have failed certain clubs, Blackpool and Pompey included. If you want to add your name to the petition you can sign it here.